It’s Not That Simple


Simple Payback Period (SPP) is a metric that all too many prospects are tempted to use when deciding whether or not to fund an expense-reducing capital project. As many of you already know, I am not a big fan of SPP.  In most cases, it’s far too simple a tool to evaluate proposed projects accurately. Here’s an example where relying on SPP along would clearly steer you wrong:

Assume a landlord realizes that he’s paying too much for utilities in his master-metered, gross-leased building.  He’s considering investing $1.00 per square foot in an expense-reducing capital project that is projected to produce $0.25 per square foot in utility savings.  One would be tempted to say that the arrangement would be a four-year payback, right?  Well, maybe not. It would be a four-year payback based on utility cost savings alone.  However, what if the landlord planned to have the building appraised the very next year for refinance or sale? 

Guess what? The extra $0.25 a square foot in utility savings would increase the landlord’s net operating income by that same amount, but the bigger news would be that now the appraiser could justify adding an extra $2.50 per square foot to the property’s value.  Why?  Because $0.25 divided by an assumed cap rate of 10% increases the value of the building by $2.50 using the Direct Capitalization variety of the Income Approach to Appraisal. That bump in value equates to two and a half times the installation cost!

That said, the fact that the higher appraised value doesn’t happen in the first year would place it outside the realm of the simple payback period calculation, which only focuses on cash flows that occur in Year 1. 

What if the landlord is laboring under the impression that the investment would have a four-year payback when in actuality, he would enjoy two and half times his money back as soon as he reappraised the building?  Focusing on the simple payback period and remaining blind to the most important part of the equation – the potential bump in appraised value – could lead a landlord to make the wrong decision.

So what’s the moral of the story? Take a look at the bigger picture before you present a financial analysis to your prospect. Show them why it doesn’t make sense to evaluate their investment with something as simple as simple payback period.

Want our daily content delivered to your inbox? Sign up for the EEFG Insiders mailing list! http://www.eefg.com/eefg-insiders
By noreply@blogger.com (Efficiency Sales Professional Institute-) | |
next post → ← previous post

Stay in Touch

Call Us

We'd love to hear from you. Call us at 808-333-7225 and we'll be happy to answer any questions you have.

Recent Insights

  • Sales Productivity

        As a business owner and sales professional, having the ability to analyze metrics and performance statistics is vital to my success. Early in my career when I was working primarily in sales, I would log and analyze all... read more

  • Now or Never

        Does your To-Do list have hundreds of items on it? Do you often find yourself putting off tasks for later? If so, you may want to consider reexamining the way in which you manage tasks. While the To-Do... read more

  • Highlight Your Experience

      One of the best ways to capture a prospect’s attention is to highlight your experience working in similar situations. While it’s not necessarily a good idea to “toot your own horn” (particularly when you’re first introducing yourself), emphasizing specific... read more